Slide 1 of 10
Unit 9 Overview: Thinking Rhetorically About Language
Unit 9 turns the rhetorical lens on language itself — examining how word choice, sentence structure, dialect, and definition are not just vehicles for argument but arguments in themselves.
- 6 Topics: Language & Power · Standard English & Hierarchies · Dialect & Code-Switching · Syntax as Rhetoric · Diction & Connotation · Defining Terms
- Pacing: ~15 class periods
- Big Ideas: STL (primary) · RHS · CLE
- Core Insight: Language is never neutral. Every linguistic choice — every word selected, every sentence structured, every term defined — is a rhetorical act with argumentative consequences.
Unit 9 is the culminating language unit: it provides the analytical vocabulary for understanding how all the rhetorical choices examined across Units 1–8 actually work at the level of words and sentences.
Slide 2 of 10
Language and Power
Control of language is a form of social power — who gets to name things, whose usage is called "correct," and how language polices identity are all rhetorical questions.
- Naming as argument: What we call something shapes how we think about it. "Freedom fighter" vs. "terrorist" for the same person — both are names, but each embeds a political argument
- Institutional language: Courts, governments, and corporations control language to control perception — legal definitions, bureaucratic jargon, and clinical terminology all reflect power
- Language policing: Correcting someone's dialect or grammar is often not about clarity but about enforcing social hierarchies — whose language is treated as the standard reveals whose authority is presumed
- Reclamation: Communities sometimes reclaim slurs or derogatory terms — a rhetorical act that challenges who has the power to name
Key question for any text: Who chose these words? Who benefits from this naming? What would a different name imply?
Slide 3 of 10
Standard English and Language Hierarchies
Standard American English (SAE) is treated as "correct" English — but it is itself a dialect, not a neutral baseline. Understanding how it became the prestige dialect is essential to analyzing language rhetorically.
- Prescriptivism vs. Descriptivism: Prescriptivists say language should follow rules; descriptivists say all dialects are equally valid, rule-governed systems — neither more "logical" nor more "correct" than another
- How SAE became "standard": Through historical power — the dialect of economic and political elites was codified in dictionaries and school grammars and declared correct, while other dialects were stigmatized
- AAVE (African American Vernacular English): A fully systematic, rule-governed dialect — not "broken" SAE. Features like habitual "be" (indicating ongoing action) follow consistent grammatical rules SAE lacks
- The cost of the hierarchy: Students who speak non-dominant dialects are often penalized in educational settings — a rhetorical injustice with real material consequences
Slide 4 of 10
Dialect, Register, and Code-Switching
Skilled language users navigate multiple dialects and registers — shifting consciously based on audience, purpose, and social context.
| Concept | Definition | Rhetorical Significance |
|---|
| Dialect | A regional or social variety of language with distinct vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation | Signals community membership, identity, and origin |
| Register | Level of formality — from casual to highly formal | Signals relationship to audience and degree of authority claimed |
| Code-switching | Shifting dialect or register based on audience and context | Demonstrates linguistic range; signals audience awareness and social navigation |
When a politician speaks more formally in a debate and more colloquially at a community cookout, this is strategic code-switching — not inauthenticity. It demonstrates audience awareness, which is a core rhetorical skill.
Slide 5 of 10
Syntax as Rhetoric
How a sentence is built — not just what it says — makes an argument. Syntactic choices control pace, emphasis, emotional force, and the hierarchy of ideas.
| Feature | Parataxis | Hypotaxis |
|---|
| Structure | Clauses side by side, no subordination | Main clause + subordinate clauses |
| Pace | Fast, punchy, urgent | Slower, deliberate, qualifying |
| Effect | Certainty, authority, immediacy | Nuance, complexity, careful reasoning |
| Example | "I came. I saw. I conquered." | "Although the journey was long, I arrived prepared." |
Asyndeton (no conjunctions) accelerates; polysyndeton (extra conjunctions) accumulates. Anaphora at the start of clauses drives momentum. Parallelism creates balance and memorability.
Slide 6 of 10
Diction and Connotation
Words carry meaning beyond their dictionary definitions — their connotations (emotional and cultural associations) often do more rhetorical work than their denotations.
- Connotation vs. denotation: "Home" and "house" denote the same structure but carry radically different connotations — one implies warmth and belonging, the other is a neutral description
- Loaded language: Words selected specifically for their emotional charge — bypassing the reader's logical evaluation by triggering affect directly
- Abstraction vs. concreteness: Concrete, specific language is more vivid and persuasive; abstract language can obscure accountability ("mistakes were made") or inflate a claim beyond its evidence
- Formal vs. colloquial: Register signals the assumed relationship between writer and reader — formal diction claims authority; colloquial diction claims intimacy or solidarity
On the AP exam: never just identify a word as "loaded" or "formal." Explain what specific associations the word activates in the target audience and how those associations serve the writer's purpose.
Slide 7 of 10
Euphemism, Dysphemism, and Doublespeak
These three strategies manipulate connotation — but for different purposes and with different degrees of intent to deceive.
- Euphemism: Substitutes a mild term for a harsh one. Can be tactful ("passed away") or manipulative ("enhanced interrogation," "collateral damage") — context determines which
- Dysphemism: Deliberately harsh substitute for a neutral term. Used to shock, delegitimize, or signal blunt in-group solidarity ("croak" for die)
- Doublespeak: Deliberately vague or misleading language designed to obscure accountability — the passive voice removes agents, nominalizations convert actions into abstract nouns, technical jargon excludes scrutiny
- Euphemistic treadmill: Over time, euphemisms acquire the stigma of the words they replaced — proving that social attitudes, not vocabulary, are the real problem
The key analytical question: Is this word choice softening a difficult reality out of compassion, or obscuring an uncomfortable reality to avoid accountability?
Slide 8 of 10
Defining Terms as Argument
Definitions are not neutral — they are argumentative moves that set the terms of debate. Whoever controls the definition often wins the argument before evidence is introduced.
- Definitional control: Arguments about abortion, gun rights, free speech, and immigration are fundamentally arguments about definitions: What counts as a "person"? What is "speech"? What is "harm"?
- Stipulative definition: Assigning a precise meaning to a term for the purposes of a specific argument — a legitimate and transparent rhetorical move when done openly
- Definitional argument: A distinct type of claim that argues X belongs (or doesn't belong) to category Y — "Is waterboarding torture?" is a definitional argument, not an empirical one
- Question-begging definitions: Definitions that assume what is to be proved — "A marriage is the union of a man and a woman" embeds the contested claim in the definition itself
In your own writing: define key terms explicitly and early. Your definition is an argument — it tells the reader what the debate is actually about.
Slide 9 of 10
Syntactic Figures: A Closer Look
The major syntactic figures are not decorative flourishes — each restructures the reader's experience of an argument in a distinct way.
| Figure | Structure | Primary Effect |
|---|
| Anaphora | Same word/phrase begins successive clauses | Emphasis, momentum, emotional insistence |
| Epistrophe | Same word/phrase ends successive clauses | Conclusion, inevitability, hammer-blow finality |
| Parallelism | Same grammatical structure repeated | Balance, clarity, memorability, implied equivalence |
| Asyndeton | Conjunctions omitted | Speed, urgency, compression, staccato force |
| Polysyndeton | Extra conjunctions added | Accumulation, weight, breathless abundance |
| Chiasmus | Reversed grammatical structure | Elegant reversal, paradox, wit |
AP shortcut: always name the figure, quote the example, then explain the specific effect in the specific context. Generic effects ("creates emphasis") earn partial credit; specific effects ("the anaphora of 'We shall fight' makes retreat psychologically inconceivable") earn full credit.
Slide 10 of 10
Unit 9 on the AP Exam
Unit 9 concepts are tested continuously across all parts of the AP English Language exam — this unit provides the micro-level analytical tools that support every other unit.
- Multiple Choice: Questions ask you to identify the effect of diction, syntax, and figurative language choices — always read for the "why" not just the "what"
- Rhetorical Analysis FRQ: The strongest essays analyze specific language choices — a particular word's connotations, the effect of a syntactic pattern, how a definition frames the argument
- Argument FRQ: Your own language choices are evaluated — precise diction, varied syntax, clear definitional moves all demonstrate the rhetorical awareness the prompt is testing
- Synthesis FRQ: Sources often differ in register, diction, and rhetorical posture — noticing and analyzing these differences is itself a form of synthesis
- The throughline: Language is never neutral. Every word, every sentence structure, every definition is a choice — and every choice reveals purpose, audience assumptions, and argumentative strategy